lunes, 28 de noviembre de 2011

Cut-up


Narratives:
  •  “Sleeping beauty”
  • Martin Luther’s King speech “I have a dream” 



      Bibliography:

  •     “Sleeping Beauty” ShemRock. Nov 2011. Web. <http://www.shemrock.com/sleeping-beauty.htm>
  •      “I Have A Dream Speech (TEXT). Huff Post politics. Nov 2011. Web. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/17/i-have-a-dream-speech-text_n_809993.html> 




domingo, 20 de noviembre de 2011

Cut- Up technique


Short stories:

  •      “Sings and Symbols” by Vladimir Nabokov.
  •      “The Rocking Horse Winner” by D.H Lawrence.

The Cut-Up story:

The Son

At the time of his birth they had been married already for a long time; a score of years had elapsed, and now they were quite old. She married for love, and the love turned to dust. She had bonny children, yet she felt they had been thrust upon her, and she could not love them. There they waited again; and instead of their boy shuffling into the room as he usually did (his poor face blotched with acne, ill-shaven, sullen, and confused), a nurse they knew, and did not care for, appeared at last and brightly explained that he had again attempted to take his life. He was all right, she said, but a visit might disturb him. Although they lived in style, they felt always an anxiety in the house. There was never enough money. The mother had a small income, and the father had a small income, but not nearly enough for the social position which they had to keep up. The father went into town to some office. But though he had good prospects, these prospects never materialised. There was always the grinding sense of the shortage of money, though the style was always kept up. And so the house came to be haunted by the unspoken phrase: There must be more money! There must be more money! The children could hear it all the time though nobody said it aloud. In silence he sat down on the steps and in silence rose when some ten minutes later she came, heavily trudging upstairs, wanly smiling,shaking her head in deprecation of her silliness.

This, and much more, she accepted - for after all living did mean accepting the loss of one joy after another, not even joys in her case – mere possibilities of improvement. She thought of the endless waves of pain that for some reason or other she and her husband had to endure; of the invisible giants hurting her boy in some unimaginable fashion; of the incalculable amount of tenderness contained in the world; of the fate of this tenderness, which is either crushed, or wasted, or transformed into madness; of neglected children humming to themselves in unswept corners; of beautiful weeds that cannot hide from the farmer and helplessly have to watch the shadow of his simian stoop leave mangled flowers in its wake, as the monstrous darkness approaches. The boy saw she did not believe him; or rather, that she paid no attention to his assertion. This angered him somewhere, and made him want to compel her attention. But he became a partner. And when the Leger was coming on Paul was 'sure' about Lively Spark, which was a quite inconsiderable horse. The boy insisted on putting a thousand on the horse, Bassett went for five hundred, and Oscar Cresswell two hundred. Lively Spark came in first, and the betting had been ten to one against him. Paul had made ten thousand. "But what are you going to do with your money?" asked the uncle.

"Of course," said the boy, "I started it for mother. She said she had no luck, because father is unlucky, so I thought if I was lucky, it might stop whispering."

"What might stop whispering?"

"Our house. I hate our house for whispering."

So Uncle Oscar signed the agreement, and Paul's mother touched the whole five thousand. Then something very curious happened. The voices in the house suddenly went mad, like a chorus of frogs on a spring evening. There were certain new furnishings, and Paul had a tutor. He was really going to Eton, his father's school, in the following autumn. There were flowers in the winter, and a blossoming of the luxury Paul's mother had been used to. And yet the voices in the house, behind the sprays of mimosa and almond-blossom, and from under the piles of iridescent cushions, simply trilled and screamed in a sort of ecstasy: "There must be more money! Oh-h-h; there must be more money. Oh, now, now-w! Now-w-w - there must be more money! - more than ever! More than ever!"

"No doctors, no doctors," he moaned, "To the devil with doctors! We must get him out of there quick. Otherwise we'll be responsible. Responsible!" he repeated and hurled himself into a sitting position, both feet on the floor, thumping his forehead with his clenched fist. He smiled a quick smile and immediately resumed his excited monologue. They would fetch him as soon as it was day. Knives would have to be kept in a locked drawer. Even at his worst he presented no danger to other people.

The Derby was drawing near, and the boy grew more and more tense. He hardly heard what was spoken to him, he was very frail, and his eyes were really uncanny. His mother had sudden strange seizures of uneasiness about him. Sometimes, for half an hour, she would feel a sudden anxiety about him that was almost anguish. She wanted to rush to him at once, and know he was safe. Then suddenly she switched on the light, and saw her son, in his green pyjamas, madly surging on the rocking-horse. The blaze of light suddenly lit him up, as he urged the wooden horse, and lit her up, as she stood, blonde, in her dress of pale green and crystal, in the doorway. The third day of the illness was critical: they were waiting for a change. The boy, with his rather long, curly hair, was tossing ceaselessly on the pillow. He neither slept nor regained consciousness, and his eyes were like blue stones. His mother sat, feeling her heart had gone, turned actually into a stone.

They sat down to their unexpected festive midnight tea. The birthday present stood on the table. He sipped noisily; his face was flushed; every now and then he imparted a circular motion to his raised glass so as to make the sugar dissolve more thoroughly . The vein on the side of his bald head where there was a large birthmark stood out conspicuously and, although he had shaved that morning, a silvery bristle showed on his chin. While she poured him another glass of tea, he put on his spectacles and re-examined with pleasure the luminous yellow, green, red little jars. His clumsy moist lips spelled out their eloquent labels: apricot, grape, beech plum, quince. He had got to crab apple, when the telephone rang again.

"I never told you, mother, that if I can ride my horse, and get there, then I'm absolutely sure - oh, absolutely! Mother, did I ever tell you? I am lucky!"

"No, you never did," said his mother.

But the boy died in the night.

And even as he lay dead, his mother heard her brother's voice saying to her, "My God, Hester, you're eighty-odd thousand to the good, and a poor devil of a son to the bad. But, poor devil, poor devil, he's best gone out of a life where he rides his rocking-horse to find a winner."

sábado, 19 de noviembre de 2011

The Cut-Up Technique and Postmodernism


Postmodernism narrative is known for its deconstruction and the different multiplicities within a single object. The spectator is needed in the story, there are no boundaries between the artist (creator) and the viewer and their identity is interchangeable. The Cut-Up technique is postmodern because it takes different elements and puts them together even if they don’t make sense but these fragments are positioned in an specific order which causes that those pieces, that are not connected, end up telling a story though a form of artistic representation. The video is a representation of the cut-Up technique and therefore it is a postmodern discourse. Throughout the video the narrator kept changing its point of view, there were many different stories being told at once   (multiplicities) that are not coherent independently but that are organized in a way that allows the different stories to develop at the same time and they are all connected by audio and images. For the video to work it also needs the viewer to understand the story otherwise it wouldn’t make sense and the piece of are will just become a bunch of different images thrown together.

The Cut-Up technique is an exemplification of postmodern art principally because of the idea of multiplicity within a single object and the concept of deconstruction. The video represents the Cut-Up technique and demonstrates why this technique is considered part of postmodernism. In fact it could be said that the Cut-Up technique has been able to succeed for its context and the ideas promoted by postmodernism since it is this art movement that allows the artist and audience to interact by work of art that is both meaningless and meaningful. 

Comparative essay:


     How to write a comparative essay, different sources that explain the process:
1.            Bookrags Articles. “How to Write a Compare/Contrast Essay”. 2011. Web. 19 Nov 2011. <http://www.bookrags.com/articles/5.html>
2.            “How to a Comparative essay”. Web. 19 Nov 2011. <http://www.ssag.sk/SSAG%20study/AJL/Hoaw%20to%20write%20a%20Comparative%20essay.pdf>
3.            Kerry, Walk. “How to write a comparative analyzes.” 1998. Web. 19 Nov 2011. <http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~wricntr/documents/CompAnalysis.html>
      Topic: The relationship between father and son portrayed in Kafka’s “A Letter to His Father” and Auster’s “The Invention of Solitude”.
       Ideas:
1.            The importance and relevance of the father in his son’s life.
2.            How the relationship between father and son affects their relationship with the outside world.
3.            The importance of remembering and writing about a father. Both authors express they’re feeling in their works as if writing could give them so closure.
      Schedule and planing:
1.            Finish reading the letter and memoir.
2.            Find quotes.
3.            Develop the topic and ideas.
4.            Create an outline that includes the basis of the introduction, body (arguments) and conclusion.
5.            Do a draft of the essay.
6.            Correct the draft.
7.            Create final essay.

Auster’s Quote


“We are continually shaped by the forces of coincidence, our lifelong certainties about the world can be demolished in a single second.”
Paul Auster

Writer Paul Auster once said the quote above. This simple sentence holds in itself many different meanings that may confront the various certainties of the modern world.   With this quote Auster affirms that man can’t have assurance for everything depends on coincidence that is uncertain. Therefore man’s knowledge can’t be more than hypothesis for there are no absolute truths. With this quote Auster takes away the certainty of an absolute truth that men so desires. The quote also means that all the elements that have build the individual’s identity are simply cause by coincidence and consequently man is a mere product of coincidence. With demolished certainties and coincidence as a ruler, humanity is left to derive in an uncertain world.

Auster with a simple phrase diminishes sciences and their knowledge; the beliefs men have gained through their lives, the confidence in “truths” humanity has gotten through its history and eventually the identity of men, their essence. Coincidence is unreliable and if its forces shape the world then the world becomes unreliable. Paul Auster sentence may cause that the individual loses all its certainties and instead only gains uncertainties but that’s they way the world and life work, according to Auster. And even if the quote’s effect is not so radical it still causes doubt whether there are absolute truths or only probable hypothesis. 

sábado, 12 de noviembre de 2011

Memory in "Inception"



In the movie Inception by Christopher Nolan the role of memory in the individual is explained. This movie is about a group of men that have the ability to enter dreams and therefore get information out or in (inception) these dreams. Thus the movie explores memory within the contrast of dreams and reality. Memory is a key factor in the decisions and actions each person commits. In the movie memory is what drives the characters towards their actions whether it is a correct  (faithful to “reality”) o incorrect memory (Unfaithful to “reality”). These actions might be right or wrong by they follow a specific objective created by memory; that can be from the past, a dream or what could have been. In the movie memory is the reason behind each action and what decides the course each actor takes.

In the movie memory is the cause of why entering dreams is possible and then gaining information from them or performing inception. Memory is what separates reality and dreams but at the same time it is what connects them and may cause confusion regarding them. Memory is the reason why dreams affect reality and the other way around. It is the memories each person contains that make up who he is, how he relates to others and why he acts on a certain way. Inception displays memory as one of man’s most important features that might be the cause and reason of every detail (important or irrelevant) in each individual's life.
 

domingo, 6 de noviembre de 2011

The Tartan “El Son” by Salvador Dali






This painting portrays the image of a young boy sailing all alone through the sea and ready to overcome whatever obstacle may come his way all by himself.     This painting as ordinary as it appears is a symbol of the relationship between parents and son. The boy sailing is someone’s son who has left his home and is on the path of finding and making his own place in the world. But The Tartan “El Son” represents more than what it portrays for it symbolizes the parent’s purpose in the young boy’s life, which are not painted. The parents raise their children and teach them how to overcome the different obstacles that life may bring along and then when the son is ready to leave they have to let him. The parents can only watch their son leave and hope they raised him well in order that he can make it through but they can’t, or at least shouldn’t, help the young boy for it is his time to be on his own and build himself up all by himself.  Salvador Dali’s concept of fatherhood is that a father should do his best to raise his children and teach them what kinds of choice to make and why, how to reach success, etc. But then when the children are no longer children the father must leave them and take a passive role in their lives.

Biography:

“Dali- The Tartan “El Son” “Over Stock Art Oil Paintings. Web. 11/6/11. <http://www.overstockart.com/tartanelson.html>

viernes, 4 de noviembre de 2011

Why writers write?


Writers write because they have the need to express themselves. While writing all kinds of events can be expressed, such as: life-changing moments, ordinary moments, moments defined by chance or choice, etc. For some authors writing can be consider a healing process that allows expressing feelings and understanding them so the writer can eventually move on. Writing may appear as the consequence of reading and admiring other authors, because then the true power of the written word is shown.  Writing gives the possibility to make a special moment in mortal (to materialize them) or to make an ordinary moment special. With writing the writer explores himself and his surrounding with a special point of view. The writer writes because he beliefs himself to have a good story to tell, a story that is both a lie and truth. A truth because no matter the genre of the story, the writer will always put something of himself in his work and a lie because no matter how realistic the story may be it will always have fictional elements. In other to write the writer must like this activity and have a story with a message that must be expressed.